Health Status in terms of Muscularity and Somatotype of Indigenous Santals of India

Riya Ghosh
Universal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Bhairahawa, Nepal.
Anup Adhikari
Centre for Health and Wellness, Kolkata, India.

Published 22-04-2026

Keywords

  • Indigenous,
  • Santal,
  • Somatotype,
  • Muscularity

How to Cite

Ghosh, R., & Adhikari, A. (2026). Health Status in terms of Muscularity and Somatotype of Indigenous Santals of India. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 6(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk26112

Dimensions

Abstract

Introduction: The Santals are the largest Indigenous population of India and Bangladesh. They are Austroasiatic-speaking Munda ethnic Aborigine group. Most of the Santals live in Villages with poor Socio-economic status. Intake of food especially balance diet is absent in poor Santal familes of remote village areas of India due to poverty. Thus, less intake of proper nutrient, results impaired development of skeletal muscles along with body shape and size. Thus, the aim of the present study was to find out the muscularity and Somatotype characteristics. Methods: 74 females and 82 males were studied for their physical characteristics and Somatotype. Different components like Endomorph, Mesomorph and Ectomorph components were noted. Economic status of the family were was also noted according to Indian categories of Socio-economic status. Somatype characteriwas were observed for both male and female Santals. Results: An average somatotype of 2.2(±0.9)-3.0(±0.7)-2.9(±0.6) for males and 3.6(±1.1)-3.3(±0.4)-2.7(±0.8) for Females were observed. The average Muscularity or both male and Female Santals were in Low Relative Category. The Low muscularity might be due to poor nutrition besides other Pathophysiological factors. Conclusion: The health status of the indigenous Santal population in India was not well which was also reflected in their poor body shape and size beside Muscularity.

References

  1. Adhikari, A., Dash, K. (2020). Somatotype of santal tribal women of West Bengal in India. Journal of the Anthropological Survey of India, 69(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277436X20927229
  2. Adhikari, A., Pathak, P., Dash, K. (2021). Equity and disparity in somatotype characteristics of Muslim women of two different places with similar socio-economic but different socio-cultural practice. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 8(2), 797-801. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20210240
  3. Carter, J.E.L., Heath, B.H. (1990). Somatotyping-Development and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. Cavallaro, F., Rahman, T. (2009). The Santals of Bangladesh. The Linguistics Journal – Special Edition, 192-220.
  5. Chaudhary, A.K., Murmu, S.S. (2024). Socio-Economic Condition of Santhal Tribe in Pakur District, Jharkhand. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 9(6).
  6. Das, M.B., Roy, K.S. (2013). Rural-Urban Differences in Nutritional Status and Physical Body Dimensions of Adult Santal Males of West Bengal. International Journal of Anthropology, 28(4).
  7. Dash, K., Adhikari, A. (2017). Comparison of nutritional status between santal tribal women and bengali women of purba medinipur, west Bengal. Indian Journal of Biological Sciences, 23, 24-33.
  8. Dash, K., Adhikari, A. (2018). Nutritional Status of Adivasi Santal Women of Urban Areas in West Bengal. India International Journal Science and Research Methodology, 9(3), 20-29.
  9. Dhargupta, A., Goswami, A., Sen, M., Mazumder, D. (2009). Study on the effect of socio-economic parameters on health status of the Toto, Santal, Sabar and Lodha tribes of West Bengal, India. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 7(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972639X.2009.11886592
  10. Esparza-Ros, F., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. and Marfell-Jones, M., (2019). International standards for anthropometric assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK).
  11. Ghosh, S. (2022). A comparative analysis of dietary intake and body composition among two ethnically distinct tribal populations from India. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76(10), 1423-1431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01121-6
  12. Ghosh, S., Malik, S.L. (2007). Parent-Offspring Correlations in Body Measurements, Physique and Physiological Variables among Santhals of West Bengal. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy, 3(1), 26-43.
  13. Ghosh, S., Malik. S.L. (2010). Variations of body physique in Santhals: An Indian tribe. Collegium Antro pologicum, 34(2), 467–472.
  14. Heath, B.H., Carter. J.E.L. (1967). A modified Somatotype method. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 27, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330270108
  15. Kuppuswamy, B.J.D.M. (1981). Manual of socioeconomic status (urban). Delhi: Manasayan, 8(4), 66-72.
  16. Majumder, S. (2021). Socioeconomic status scales: Revised Kuppuswamy, BG Prasad, and Udai Pareekh’s scale updated for 2021. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10(11), 3964-3967. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_600_21
  17. Mandal, I., Hossain, S.R. (2025). Modified Kuppuswamy scale updated for the year 2025. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 12(5), 2423-2425. https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20251411
  18. Mukherjee, S., Malik, U.S. (2020). Socio-ecological Niche of Tribes of Purulia District, West Bengal, India. Habitat, Ecology and Ekistics, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49115-4_10
  19. Patel, S.P., Maharana, R. (2018). The santhal: socio-economic miserable condition and quality of life (An overview of Bantali Rakhasahi village, Mayurbhanj district, Odisha). IJRDO-Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 3(1), 83-102.