Anthropometric Determinants and Predictive Modeling of Upper Body Strength in Athletes

Sanjay Kumar Prajapati
SAI LNCPE, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695581, India.
Mukesh Kumar Verma
NCERT, New Delhi, India
Harshit Verma
Sports University of Haryana, Haryana, India
Sanjeev Shivanagouda Patil
SAI LNCPE, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695581, India.
Susheel Gupta
Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Faizabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Vivek Venugopal Pai
SAI LNCPE, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala-695581, India.

Published 16-04-2026

Keywords

  • Upper Body Strength,
  • Bench Press,
  • Arm Girth,
  • Performance

How to Cite

Prajapati, S. K., Verma, M. K., Verma, H., Patil, S. S., Gupta, S., & Pai, V. V. (2026). Anthropometric Determinants and Predictive Modeling of Upper Body Strength in Athletes. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 6(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2619

Dimensions

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of our study was to predict upper-body strength on the basis of anthropometric variables. Methods: A total of 50 male athletes were chosen as subjects for the study. The age criteria for the subjects were between 18 and 25 years. The anthropometric variables were chosen as independent variable i.e. Standing Height and Weight were obtained using an electronic scale (Seca Instruments Ltd. Hamburg, Germany) with a precision of up to .001m, Arm Span, Iliac Crest Height, Arm Length was measured with the Segmometer (Cescorf Flexible Segmometer), Sitting Height was measured with the Holtain Sitting Height Table, Girth Measurement (Biceps, Waist, Thigh, Calf, Hip) were determined using a Steel tape, Skin fold for Biceps, Triceps, Subscapular, Supraspinale, Thigh, Calf were obtained with a skinfold caliper and recorded in millimetres (Harpenden Skinfold).  Body Composition was facilitated by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). Bone Breadth of Humerus, Femur, and Shoulder was measured by Small (CESCORF Slide Caliper) and large Sliding Caliper (Cescorf Large Sliding Caliper) and the dependent variable, i.e. Upper arm strength, was measured with bench press 1 RM Test. Pearson product-multiple correlation was used to find out the relationship between anthropometric variables and bench press strength. A regression equation was used to predict upper arm strength based on anthropometric characteristics. Results: A strong correlation (r = 0.791) indicates that body measurements collectively have a significant impact on upper body strength. R Square (.619) as a predictor was included, which means that 61.9% of the variance in the bench press was associated with changes in the anthropometric variable. Conclusion: Regression equation finding the combination of constant flexed arm girth could provide a reasonably good estimation of bench press performance.

References

  1. Bice, M.R., Ball, J.W., Hollman, A., Adkins, M. (2019). Health Technology Use: Implications for Physical Activity Behaviors Among College Students. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 3(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2018.1516524
  2. Calestine, J., Bopp, M., Bopp, C.M., Papalia, Z. (2017). College Student Work Habits are Related to Physical Activity and Fitness. International Journal of Exercise Science, 10(7), 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.70252/XLOM8139
  3. Esparza-Ros, F., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R. and Marfell-Jones, M., 2019. International standards for anthropometric assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK).
  4. Fountaine, C., Liguori, G., Mozumdar, A., Kincaid, J., Kouba, S. (2008). Television Viewing, Screen Time, and Physical Activity in College Students. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(5), S438. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000322865.70399.29
  5. Fountaine, C., Liguori, G., Mozumdar, A., Schuna, J. (2011). Physical Activity and Screen Time Sedentary Behaviors in College Students. International Journal of Exercise Science, 4(2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.70252/IUHK4065
  6. Fountaine, C.J., Liguori, G., Mozumdar, A. (2009). Screen Time is Not an Impediment to Physical Activity in College Students. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(5), 22–23.
  7. Ge, Y., Xin, S., Luan, D., Zou, Z., Bai, X., Liu, M., Gao, Q. (2020). Independent and combined associations between screen time and physical activity and perceived stress among college students. Addictive Behaviors, 103, 106224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106224
  8. Lavados-Romo, P., Andrade-Mayorga, O., Morales, G., Muñoz, S., Balboa-Castillo, T. (2023). Association of screen time and physical activity with health-related quality of life in college students. Journal of American College Health, 71(5), 1504–1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1942006
  9. Ma, C., Zhou, L., Xu, W., Ma, S., Wang, Y. (2020). Associations of physical activity and screen time with suboptimal health status and sleep quality among Chinese college freshmen: A cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE, 15(9), e0239429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239429
  10. Torres, L., Caciula, M.C., Tomoiaga, A.S., Gugu-Gramatopol, C. (2023). Correlations between Mental Health, Physical Activity, and Body Composition in American College Students after the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(22), 7045. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20227045
  11. Wu, X., Tao, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Tao, F. (2015). Low Physical Activity and High Screen Time Can Increase the Risks of Mental Health Problems and Poor Sleep Quality among Chinese College Students. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0119607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119607
  12. Zanovec, M., Lakkakula, A., Johnson, L., Tuuri, G. (2009). Physical Activity is Associated with Percent Body Fat and Body Composition but not BMI in White and Black College Students. International Journal of Exercise Science, 2(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.70252/MDOK6464