ISAK Home

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Volume 5, Issue 1, Year 2025

Articles

Morphological Characteristics and Position-Specific Motivational Attributes in University Footballers

  • Bapan Debnath,
  • Mukesh Kumar Verma,
  • Gopal Chandra Saha,
  • Subhashis Biswas
Bapan Debnath
Department of Physical Education and Yoga, The ICFAI University Tripura, India
Mukesh Kumar Verma
Department of Education in Social Science, NCERT, New Delhi, India
Gopal Chandra Saha
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Visva-Bharati, India.
Subhashis Biswas
Department of Physical Education and Yoga, The ICFAI University Tripura, India
PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk25117

Published 22-04-2025

Keywords

  • Anthropometry,
  • Somato Chart,
  • Footballers,
  • Motivation,
  • SMS-28

How to Cite

Debnath, B., Verma, M. K., Saha, G. C., & Biswas, S. (2025). Morphological Characteristics and Position-Specific Motivational Attributes in University Footballers. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 5(1), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk25117

Copyright (c) 2025 Bapan Debnath, Mukesh Kumar Verma, Gopal Chandra Saha, Subhashis Biswas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Dimensions

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Introduction: The interplay between morphological characteristics and motivational attributes are crucial for sports performance. The study aimed to explore morphological characteristics and motivational attributes across different playing positions of football. Methods: Fifty four university representing male footballers has been randomly selected and categorized into defenders (n=16), goalkeepers (n=8), midfielders (n=19) and strikers (n=11).  Anthropometric variables and sports motivation scale (SMS-28) were used to measure the morphological physiognomies and motivational attributes. Results: The study explores defenders as Endomorphic Mesomorph (2.7-4.1-2.4), goalkeepers as Mesomorphic Ectomorph (2.2-2.6-4.1), midfielders as Ectomorphic Mesomorph (2.2-3.9-2.6) and strikers as Ectomorphic Mesomorph (2.2-3.9-2.6). According to distribution pattern of the data a one way ANOVA has been employed and a significant difference has been in height (p<0.001) and mesomorphy (p=0.014) components. Goalkeepers demonstrated the highest height, while midfielders exhibited the lowest. Conversely, midfielders displayed the highest mesomorphy compared to other positions. Ectomorphy also significantly varied across positions (p<0.001), with goalkeepers showing the highest values.  Interestingly, significant differences were observed in motivation attributes, particularly in extrinsic motivation-external regulation (p=0.044), extrinsic motivation-introjected regulation (p=0.026), and intrinsic motivation to accomplish (p=0.007). Goalkeepers displayed higher scores in external regulation compared to midfielders and strikers. Defenders exhibited greater introjected regulation compared to goalkeepers and strikers. Amotivation demonstrates moderate positive correlations with all other motivation sub-scales (ranging from 0.286 to 0.764, p<0.05). Regarding morphological characteristics, Endomorphy and Mesomorphy demonstrate weak correlations with motivation sub-scales (-0.043 to 0.184). Conclusions: These findings underscore the complex interaction between motivational sub-scales and morphological characteristics in the context of university footballers, highlighting the importance of considering both psychological and physical factors in athlete development and performance optimization.

PDF

References

  1. Carling, C., Le Gall, F., Dupont, G. (2012). Are physical performance and injury risk in a professional soccer team in match-play affected over a prolonged period of fixture congestion? International Journal of Sports Medicine, 33(1): 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1283190
  2. Carter, J. (2002). The Heath—Carter Anthropometric Somatotype—Instruction Manual. Surrey TeP and ROSSCRAFT.
  3. Csáki, I., Szakály, Z., Fózer-Selmec, B., Kiss, S.Z., Bognár, J. (2017). Psychological and Anthropometric Characteristics of a Hungarian Elite Football Academy’s Players. Physical Culture and Sport. 73(1): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/pcssr-2017-0002
  4. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4): 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  5. Gardasevic, J., Bjelica, D., Vasiljevic, I. (2019). Morphological Characteristics and Body Composition of Elite Soccer Players in Montenegro. International Journal of Morphology, 37(1): 284–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022019000100284
  6. Jones, S., Drust, B. (2007). Physiological and technical demands of 4 v 4 and 8 v 8 in elite youth soccer players. Kinesiology, 39: 150–156.
  7. Kelungleuyile, B.D., Daw, S., Biswas, S. (2024). Physical Fitness and Motivational Dynamics of North East Indian Collegiate Volleyball and Basketball Players. 6 (13): 4924–4933. http://dx.doi.org/10.48047/AFJBS.6.13.2024.4924-4933
  8. Kubayi, A., Paul, Y., Mahlangu, P., Toriola, A. (2017). Physical Performance and Anthropometric Characteristics of Male South African University Soccer Players. Journal of Human Kinetics, 60(1): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0098
  9. Mladenovic, M., Marjanovic, A., Kuzikova, S. (2011). Motivation of Young Russian Football Players.
  10. Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Briére, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.35
  11. Reilly, T., Bangsbo, J., Franks, A. (2000). Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9): 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410050120050
  12. Saha, S., Kundu, B., Mondal, S. (2014). Positional differences in morphology, somatotype and body composition characteristics in university level Indian footballers. Journal of Trainology, 3(1): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.17338/trainology.3.1_35
  13. Slimani, M., Nikolaidis, P.T. (2018). Anthropometric and physiological characteristics of male soccer players according to their competitive level, playing position and age group: a systematic review. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 59(1):141-163. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07950-6
  14. Srhoj, V., Marinović, M., & Rogulj, N. (2002). Position specific morphological characteristics of top-level male handball players. Collegium Antropologicum, 26(1), 219–227. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12137302
  15. Strauss, A., Sparks, M., Pienaar, C. (2021). Comparison of the Morphological Characteristics of South African Sub-Elite Female Football Players According to Playing Position. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7): 3603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073603
  16. Vallerand, R.J., Losier, G.F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1): 142–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956
  17. Zuber, C., Zibung, M., Conzelmann, A. (2015). Motivational patterns as an instrument for predicting success in promising young football players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(2): 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.928827