ISAK Home

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Volume 3, Issue 1, Year 2023

Articles

Effect of Maturity Status and Relative Age Effect on Anthropometrics and Physical Performance of Soccer Players Aged 12 to 15 Years

  • Seyed Houtan Shahidi,
  • Levent Yilmaz,
  • Joseph Esformes
Seyed Houtan Shahidi
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports Coaching, Istanbul Gedik University, Istanbul, Turkey
Levent Yilmaz
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Sports Coaching, Istanbul Gedik University, Istanbul, Turkey
Joseph Esformes
Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2317

Published 30-06-2023

Keywords

  • Maturity,
  • Soccer,
  • Anthropometry,
  • Physical Performance,
  • Body fat %

How to Cite

Shahidi, S. H., Yilmaz, L., & Esformes, J. (2023). Effect of Maturity Status and Relative Age Effect on Anthropometrics and Physical Performance of Soccer Players Aged 12 to 15 Years. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 3(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2317

Copyright (c) 2023 Seyed Houtan Shahidi, Levent Yilmaz, Joseph Esformes

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Dimensions

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Introduction: There is a growing interest in the relationship between biological maturation, relative age effect, and soccer sports performance. Based on their cohort's relative age effect and maturation, relatively older soccer players can be favored to be selected for high-level teams.  Therefore, the current study examined the effect of maturity and relative age on anthropometric and physical performance tests. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 82 boys (M age: 13.4 ± 1.1; M body mass: 51.9 ± 9.9;   body height: 162 ± 10.5; body fat%: 9.7 ± 1.1) were assessed for anthropometric, flexibility, hand, and leg strength, and countermovement jump performance. Peak height velocity (PHV) determination was used for maturity status estimation. The birthdate distributions were categorized into four quartiles (January-March, Q1; April-June, Q2; July-September, Q3; October-December, Q4). MANOVA analysis was performed on all anthropometric and physical performance assessments to examine differences within age groups and maturity status groups. Differences among all groups were revealed, with high scores in the older group (U-15). Results: Biological maturation influences the differences in the anthropometric and physical performance assessment with a significant effect on the early matured soccer players compared to the late matured.  Early matured players were overrepresented and statistically had better anthropometric and physical performance results. Conclusion: However, there was no significant representation of players in the first quarter compared to the third and fourth quarters for all the anthropometric and performance assessments. The current findings can be used for quantifying and controlling performance data of soccer players adjusted to biological requirements used in the training process.

PDF

References

  1. Ackland, T.R., Elliott, B., & Bloomfield, J. (2009). Applied anatomy and biomechanics in sport. Human Kinetics.
  2. Albaladejo-Saura, M., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., González-Gálvez, N., & Esparza-Ros, F. (2021). Relationship between biological maturation, physical fitness, and kinanthropometric variables of young athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1): 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010328
  3. Boucher, J.L., & Mutimer, B.T. (1994). The relative age phenomenon in sport: A replication and extension with ice-hockey players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(4): 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607644
  4. Carter, J.L., Carter, J.L., & Heath, B.H. (1990). Somatotyping: development and applications. Cambridge university press.
  5. Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & McKenna, J. (2009). Annual age-grouping and athlete development. Sports Medicine, 39(3): 235-256. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939030-00005
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). The effect size. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 77-83.
  7. D'Hondt, v., Deforche, B., Vaeyens, R., Vandorpe, B., Vandendriessche, J., Pion, J., Renaat P., Ilse de B., Lenoir, M. (2011). Gross motor coordination in relation to weight status and age in 5-to 12-year-old boys and girls: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 6(sup3): e556-564. https://doi.org/10.3109/17477166.2010.500388
  8. Helsen F.W., Hodges, N. J., Winckel, J. v., & Starkes, J. L. (2000). The roles of talent, physical precocity and practice in the development of soccer expertise. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(9): 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410050120104
  9. Fragoso, I., Massuca, L., & Ferreira, J. (2015). Effect of birth month on physical fitness of soccer players (Under-15) according to biological maturity. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(01): 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384548
  10. Gil, S. M., Badiola, A., Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I., Zabala-Lili, J., Gravina, L., Santos-Concejero, J., Jose A.L., Granados, C. (2014). Relationship between the relative age effect and anthropometry, maturity and performance in young soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(5), 479-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2013.832355
  11. Götze, M., & Hoppe, M.W. (2021). Relative age effect in elite german soccer: influence of gender and competition level. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 587023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587023
  12. Heilmann, F., Memmert, D., Weinberg, H., & Lautenbach, F. (2022). The relationship between executive functions and sports experience, relative age effect, as well as physical maturity in youth soccer players of different ages. International journal of sport and exercise psychology, 21(2): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.2025141
  13. Hill, M., Scott, S., Malina, R. M., McGee, D., & Cumming, S. P. (2020). Relative age and maturation selection biases in academy football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(11-12): 1359-1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1649524
  14. Hirose, N. (2009). Relationships among birth-month distribution, skeletal age and anthropometric characteristics in adolescent elite soccer players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(11), 1159-1166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903225145
  15. Hoppe, M.W., Barnics, V., Freiwald, J., & Baumgart, C. (2020). Contrary to endurance, power associated capacities differ between different aged and starting-nonstarting elite junior soccer players. PloS One, 15(4): e0232118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232118
  16. Jakobsson, J., Julin, A.L., Persson, G., & Malm, C. (2021). Darwinian Selection Discriminates Young Athletes: the Relative Age Effect in Relation to Sporting Performance. Sports Medicine-Open, 7(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-021-00300-2
  17. Johnson, D., Bradley, B., Williams, S., Whiteside, E., & Cumming, S. (2022). The effect of bio-banding on between-player variance in size and speed in male academy soccer players. Sport Performance and Science Reports, 157.
  18. Jones, M., Hitchen, P., & Stratton, G. (2000). The importance of considering biological maturity when assessing physical fitness measures in girls and boys aged 10 to 16 years. Annals of Human Biology, 27(1): 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/030144600282389
  19. Kelly, A.L., Wilson, M.R., Gough, L.A., Knapman, H., Morgan, P., Cole, M., Daniel T.J., Williams, C.A. (2020). A longitudinal investigation into the relative age effect in an English professional football club: Exploring the ‘underdog hypothesis’. Science and Medicine in Football, 4(2): 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2019.1694169
  20. Lovell, R., Towlson, C., Parkin, G., Portas, M., Vaeyens, R., & Cobley, S. (2015). Soccer player characteristics in English lower-league development programmes: The relationships between relative age, maturation, anthropometry and physical fitness. PloS One, 10(9): e0137238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137238
  21. McCarthy, N., & Collins, D. (2014). Initial identification & selection bias versus the eventual confirmation of talent: evidence for the benefits of a rocky road?. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32(17): 1604-1610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137238
  22. Mirwald, R.L., G. Baxter-Jones, A. D., Bailey, D. A., & Beunen, G. P. (2002). An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34(4): 689-694. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200204000-00020
  23. Pedersen, A.V., Aune, T.K., Dalen, T., & Lorås, H. (2022). Variations in the relative age effect with age and sex, and over time—Elite-level data from international soccer world cups. PloS One, 17(4): e0264813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264813
  24. Pérez-González, B., León-Quismondo, J., Bonal, J., Burillo, P., & Fernández-Luna, Á. (2021). The New Generation of Professional Soccer Talent Is Born under the Bias of the RAE: Relative Age Effect in International Male Youth Soccer Championships. Children, 8(12): 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8121117
  25. Perini, T.A., Oliveira, G.L.d., Ornellas, J.d.S., & Oliveira, F.P.d. (2005). Technical error of measurement in anthropometry. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 11: 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-86922005000100009
  26. Segueida-Lorca, Á., Barrera, J., Valenzuela-Contreras, L., & Herrera-Valenzuela, T. (2022). Comparing Body Composition in Young Footballers Categorised by Bio-Banding. Apunts: Educació Física i Esports, (149): 45-52. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2022/3).149.05
  27. Shahidi, S.H., Kingsley, J.D., Svensson, M., TAŞKIRAN, M.Y., & Hassani, F. (2021). Training Wiser Instead of Training Harder: A Complex Training Program (CPX). Journal of Health and Sport Sciences, 4(1): 15-18.
  28. Shahidi, S. H., Kingsley, J. D., & Taskiran, M.Y. (2022). Talent Identification Pathway “Coaches, Family, and Environment Eyes. Journal of Health and Sport Sciences, 5(1): 17-20.
  29. Smith, K.L., Weir, P.L., Till, K., Romann, M., & Cobley, S. (2018). Relative age effects across and within female sport contexts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 48(6): 1451-1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0890-8
  30. Toselli, S., Campa, F., Maietta Latessa, P., Greco, G., Loi, A., Grigoletto, A., & Zaccagni, L. (2021). Differences in maturity and anthropometric and morphological characteristics among young male basketball and soccer players and non-players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8): 3902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083902
  31. Toselli, S., Mauro, M., Grigoletto, A., Cataldi, S., Benedetti, L., Nanni, G., Riccardo D.M., Paolo A., Davide G., Fischetti, F., Gianpiero G. (2022). Maturation Selection Biases and Relative Age Effect in Italian Soccer Players of Different Levels. Biology, 11(11): 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111559
  32. Towlson, C., & Cumming, S.P. (2022). Bio-banding in soccer: Past, present, and future. Annals of Human Biology, 49(7-8): 269-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2022.2129091
  33. Towlson, C., MacMaster, C., Gonçalves, B., Sampaio, J., Toner, J., MacFarlane, N., Steve B., Ally H., Rory J., Hunter, F., Amy S., Tony M., Grant A. (2022). The effect of bio-banding on technical and tactical indicators of talent identification in academy soccer players. Science and Medicine in Football, 6(3): 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2021.2013522
  34. Towlson, C., Salter, J., Ade, J. D., Enright, K., Harper, L. D., Page, R. M., & Malone, J. J. (2021). Maturity-associated considerations for training load, injury risk, and physical performance in youth soccer: One size does not fit all. Journal of sport and health science, 10(4): 403-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.003
  35. Trecroci, A., Longo, S., Perri, E., Iaia, F. M., & Alberti, G. (2019). Field-based physical performance of elite and sub-elite middle-adolescent soccer players. Research in Sports Medicine, 27(1): 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2018.1504217
  36. Vaeyens, R., Philippaerts, R.M., & Malina, R.M. (2005). The relative age effect in soccer: A match-related perspective. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(7), 747-756. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400022052
  37. Viero, V., Triossi, T., Bianchi, D., Campagna, A., & Melchiorri, G. (2020). Physical and performance variables for talent identification in water polo. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 60(10): 1309-1316. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.10712-6
  38. Werneck, F.Z., Coelho, E.F., De Oliveira, H., Júnior, D.R., Almas, S.P., De Lima, J., Matta, M.O., Figueiredo, A.J. (2016). Relative age effect in Olympic basketball athletes. Science & Sports, 31(3): 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2015.08.004
  39. Zuber, C., Zibung, M., & Conzelmann, A. (2016). Holistic patterns as an instrument for predicting the performance of promising young soccer players - A3-years longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 1088-1088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01088