ISAK Home

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Volume 2, Issue 2, Year 2022

Articles

Somatotype and Anthropometric characteristics of Indian Female Rowers

  • Anup Adhikari,
  • Debaarati Chakrabarti
Anup Adhikari
Anthropometrica, Toronto, Canada
Debaarati Chakrabarti
Sports Authority of India, NCOE, Alleppey, Kerala, India
PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2227

Published 31-12-2022

Keywords

  • Somatotype,
  • Anthropometry,
  • Endomorphy,
  • Mesomorphy,
  • Ectomorphy,
  • Female Rowers,
  • National Level
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Adhikari, A., & Chakrabarti, D. (2022). Somatotype and Anthropometric characteristics of Indian Female Rowers. International Journal of Kinanthropometry, 2(2), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijk2227

Copyright (c) 2022 Anup Adhikari, Debaarati Chakrabarti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Dimensions

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Introduction: Eighteen national-level Indian Female Rowers were studied for their somatotype and anthropometric characteristics as performance in Rowing as performance level in rowing depends on physical and anthropometrical characteristics besides other factors including skill. Material and Methods: Height and weight were measured according to the methods standardized by The International Society for The Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). Somatotype was calculated using Heath-Carter (1967) method. Results: Average height and weight of the Indian national-level Female Rowers were 167.8 ±4.1 (160.7-174.0) cm and 59.5±6.5 (47.7-69.3) kg respectively. The average Somatotype of the Indian National level female Rowers was 5.4 (±1.0)-3.2(±0.8)-1.6(±0.9) with a range between 3.8-1.8-1.6 and 6.9-4.6-4.9. Conclusion: Average Mesomorphic Endomorh body type with less muscularity on average was observed for the Indian national Female Rowers. Poor muscularity and less height might be one reason besides other factors a reason for poor performance of Indian Female Rowers in Olympic and other International competitions.

PDF

References

  1. Ackland, T., Kerr, D., Hume, P., Norton, K., Ridge, B., Clark, S., Broad, E., Ross, W. (2002). Anthropometric normative data for Olympic rowers and paddlers, Sport Medicine Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
  2. Adhikari, A., McNeely, E. (2015). Anthropometric Characteristics, Somatotype and Body Composition of Canadian Female Rower, American journal of Sports Science. 3(3): 61-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20150303.15
  3. Akça, F., Akalan, C., Koz, M., Ersoz, G. (2010). İnvesgation of oxygen consumption and lactact e profiles in Turkish Elite Jjunior Rowers. Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 13(2): 77-80.
  4. Arslanoğlu, E., Acar, K., Mor, A., Baynaz, K., İpekoğlu, G., Arslanoglu, C. (2020). Body Composition and Somatotype Profiles of Rowers. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise /Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, 22(3): 431-443.
  5. Bourgois, J., Claessens, A.L., Janssens, M., van Renterghe, B., Loos, R., Thomis, M., Philippaerts, R., Lefevre, J., Vrijens, J. (2001). Anthropometric characteristics of elite female junior rowers, Journal of Sports Sciences. 19 (3): 195-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404101750095358
  6. Carter, J.E.L., Aubry, S.P., Sleet, D.A. (1982). Somatotype of Montreal Olympic athletes. In Physical structure of Olympic athletes, Part I. the Montreal Olympic games Anthropological project, Basel, Karger, 16: 53-80. https://doi.org/10.1159/000406781
  7. Carter, J.E.L., Heath, B.H. (1990). Sport and Physical Performance, in Somatotyping -Development and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 266-267.
  8. Damjan, M., Grgantov, Sc. Z., Mirjana, M., Erceg, Sc. M., Hrvoje, S. (2013b). Somatotype Differences in young Croatian Rowers and soccer players, International Journal of Scientific Research. 2(10).
  9. Eiben, O.G., Bodzsar, E.B. (2002) Children and youth at the beginning of the 21st centuries: Humanbiologia Budapenstinensis. 27: 59-165
  10. Hebbelinck, M., Ross, W.D., Carter, J.E.L., Borms, J. (1980). Anthropometric Characteristics of female Olympic rowers. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 5(4): 255-262.
  11. Jakovljević, V., Bošnjak, G., Pašić, G., Tešanović, G. (2022 ). Roll of Somatotype in Sport selection. Acta Kinesiologica, 16(1): 84-92. https://doi.org/10.51371/issn.1840-2976.2022.16.1.11
  12. McArdle, W.D., Katch, F.I., Katch, V.I. (2010). Exercise Physiology: Nutrition, Energy, and Human Performance, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA.
  13. Mészáros, J., Mohácsi, J. (1982a). The somatotype of hungarian male and female class I paddlers and rower. Anthropologiai Kȍzlemények, 26(1-2). 175-179.
  14. Rodriguez, F.A. (1986). Physical structure of international lightweight rowers. Kinanthropometry III, London. 255– 261.
  15. Ross, W.D., Ward, R., Leahy, R.M., Day, J.A.P. (1982). Proportionality of Montreal athletes. In Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes, Karger, 16: 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1159/000406782
  16. Slater, G.I., Rice, A.J., Mujika, I., Hahn, A.G., Sharpe, K., Jenkins, D.G. (2005). Physique traits of lightweight rowers and their relationship to competitive success, British Journal of Sports Medicine. 39: 736-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.015990